Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Validation Config File from the Repository #829

Closed
signedav opened this issue Oct 6, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #998
Closed

Validation Config File from the Repository #829

signedav opened this issue Oct 6, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #998
Labels
approved approved for implementation enhancement mb-group Focused by Model Baker Group usabILItyhub formerly known as InterlisPlus

Comments

@signedav
Copy link
Member

signedav commented Oct 6, 2023

Since this integration #828 we can store config files per project. In UsabILIty Hub we can store the project variable, means the path. When the path is already an ilidata:key then this could work as long as it's stored per model.

At the moment this ilidata:key needs to be entered manually (no file from the repo selectable in the line edit of the validator - not sure if it should be supported, because it would be the only functionality where we use the repos after project generation (during editing)).

But if it's a path to a file this file will not be "exported" into a topic. It's a conceptional thing. Usually we do not store files permanently on a Topping import. So where should this file be stored?

As attachment file next to the project file (but on generation there is not a project file stored - so complicated)

Write it into the project (but this is very intransparent)

Being able to export it and add it as topping-file (like the catalogue file) - after that the key is written to this specific project variable (preferred possibility)

@signedav signedav added enhancement usabILItyhub formerly known as InterlisPlus labels Oct 6, 2023
@signedav signedav added approved approved for implementation mb-group Focused by Model Baker Group labels Aug 21, 2024
@signedav
Copy link
Member Author

signedav commented Dec 2, 2024

Would mean it's a topping exporter thing.

  1. reading of variable
  2. create a topping file of it
  3. create a link to the topping file (maybe change the project variable)

Makes me think if a custom property would have been nicer than a project variable and if we can change this or if it should remain the same 🤔

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved approved for implementation enhancement mb-group Focused by Model Baker Group usabILItyhub formerly known as InterlisPlus
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant