-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
consider citation in record model #116
Comments
@tomkralidis I know this is important for certain domains but I am not sure this is "core" functionality. I would leave it for communities that want it to define. |
@pvretano I agree that it is important for some communities, and perhaps they should define the details, but I do not think that that would encourage interoperability. Maybe there needs to be a standard extension/part/framework to ensure reasonable interoperability with details such are style, language or terminology being community defined. |
For what it's worth, here's the corresponding STAC extension for inspiration and/or alignment: https://github.com/stac-extensions/scientific |
SWG 2021-06-17: @cportele keep core as small as possible. Can be part of extension, or proposal for future work. |
07-APR-2023: Not applicable for core. |
As mentioned by @gaubert, it would be valuable to express citation in record metadata. Should we consider this for the core (i.e.
properties.bibliographicCitation
) or leave for downstream communities to define as extensions/additional properties.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: