Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move partitioning conformance classes to Part 1 & add subset query parameter #76

Closed
jerstlouis opened this issue Jul 28, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@jerstlouis
Copy link
Member

Suggesting that:

  • bbox,
  • subset,
  • map tiles

be separate conformance classes, but all defined in Part 1 (they are currently in https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogcapi-maps/tree/master/extensions/partitioning/standard).

This would reflect the fact that bbox is a basic capability that most implementations will want to implement, yet allow implementers to achieve conformance with Core, and only implement the partitioning mechanisms that they care to support initially.

@joanma747
Copy link
Contributor

We accepted this proposal in the OGC MM 120.

@joanma747
Copy link
Contributor

WE should implement this in the document structure in github.

@cmheazel
Copy link
Contributor

cmheazel commented Sep 15, 2021

There are some API Modules at API-Common that you may find useful. Look under the API_Modules directory.

image

@jerstlouis jerstlouis changed the title Move partinioning conformance classes to Part 1 & add subset query parameter Move partitioning conformance classes to Part 1 & add subset query parameter Sep 16, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants