You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Supporting the use of Epoch in GeoPackages for the DGIWG GeoPackage profile (to be edition 1.1), related to issue #675, found a limitation that could be addressed by the SWG.
Because the gpkg_spatial_ref_sys has a single row for each srs_id (primary key) in a GeoPackage, the definition of Epoch for a GeoPackage is limited to one Epoch date per CRS. Without using multiple srs_id values, multiple epoch dates for gridded data with the same srs_id must be stored in distinct GeoPackage files.
How would uses embed 2 different elevation tile matrix sets with the same CRS that were collected at two different time? Could be necessary it the difference is significant number of years.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Because the gpkg_spatial_ref_sys has a single row for each srs_id (primary key) in a GeoPackage, the definition of Epoch for a GeoPackage is limited to one Epoch date per CRS
Just create one entry per (CRS, epoch) tuple that will have its own srs_id. Similarly to what was discussed in #676 (comment) and #676 (comment)
Supporting the use of Epoch in GeoPackages for the DGIWG GeoPackage profile (to be edition 1.1), related to issue #675, found a limitation that could be addressed by the SWG.
Because the gpkg_spatial_ref_sys has a single row for each srs_id (primary key) in a GeoPackage, the definition of Epoch for a GeoPackage is limited to one Epoch date per CRS. Without using multiple srs_id values, multiple epoch dates for gridded data with the same srs_id must be stored in distinct GeoPackage files.
How would uses embed 2 different elevation tile matrix sets with the same CRS that were collected at two different time? Could be necessary it the difference is significant number of years.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: