-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Copy/paste performance testing #87
Comments
@ormsbee FYI. Anything to add to this task description? |
@bradenmacdonald: No, it looks good to me, ty! |
Findings have been shared at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zpgwiDuIWJIPjlN6vNASkEfGy2JNrCqQTCTsT5UrQ1Q/edit and we have updated our future plans accordingly (seems like no need for async). Marking this as done. |
github-project-automation
bot
moved this from In Progress
to Done
in New Feature: Copy/Paste
Sep 13, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Using the sandbox at https://clipboard-preview.do.opencraft.hosting/ , test the performance of copying and pasting extremely large units that have something like ~25, 50, 100, and 500 XBlocks in them, including some with static asset files. Get a rough idea of how long the copy and paste operations each take as a function of the number of xblocks and/or size of the static files.
Why: we need to decide if we're going to use a fully asynchronous (celery task) operation for copying/pasting subsections and sections in the course. For now, we can simulate and measure this using large units. We may also want to make the unit copy/paste asynchronous too, depending on our findings.
Depends on openedx/edx-platform#32891
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: