fix: allow iteration over all event types #844
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Todd Baert <[email protected]>
beeme1mr
approved these changes
Mar 1, 2024
This was referenced Mar 1, 2024
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 5, 2024
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- ## [0.0.27](core-v0.0.26...core-v0.0.27) (2024-03-05) ### ✨ New Features * maintain state in SDK, add RECONCILING ([#795](#795)) ([cfb0a69](cfb0a69)) ### 🐛 Bug Fixes * allow iteration over all event types ([#844](#844)) ([411c7b4](411c7b4)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please). --------- Signed-off-by: OpenFeature Bot <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: openfeature-peer-update-bot <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: openfeature-peer-update-bot <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Todd Baert <[email protected]>
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 5, 2024
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- ## [1.13.0](server-sdk-v1.12.0...server-sdk-v1.13.0) (2024-03-05) ### ✨ New Features * context propagation ([#837](#837)) ([b1abef1](b1abef1)) * maintain state in SDK, add RECONCILING ([#795](#795)) ([cfb0a69](cfb0a69)) ### 🐛 Bug Fixes * allow iteration over all event types ([#844](#844)) ([411c7b4](411c7b4)) * correct rollup to bundle all but core ([#846](#846)) ([f451e25](f451e25)) ### 🧹 Chore * **main:** release core 0.0.27 ([#839](#839)) ([ccbb1f9](ccbb1f9)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please). Signed-off-by: OpenFeature Bot <[email protected]>
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 5, 2024
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- ## [0.4.14](web-sdk-v0.4.13...web-sdk-v0.4.14) (2024-03-05) ### ✨ New Features * maintain state in SDK, add RECONCILING ([#795](#795)) ([cfb0a69](cfb0a69)) * suspend on RECONCILING, mem provider fixes ([#796](#796)) ([8101ff1](8101ff1)) ### 🐛 Bug Fixes * allow iteration over all event types ([#844](#844)) ([411c7b4](411c7b4)) * correct rollup to bundle all but core ([#846](#846)) ([f451e25](f451e25)) ### 🧹 Chore * **main:** release core 0.0.27 ([#839](#839)) ([ccbb1f9](ccbb1f9)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please). Signed-off-by: OpenFeature Bot <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Todd Baert <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Todd Baert <[email protected]>
This was referenced Mar 12, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is an addendum to #816.
Since the
addHandleroverloads for the event types (ProviderEvents.ConfigurationChangedandNotChangeEvents) are mutually exclusive, it was impossible to iterate over them and pass the same function...I had to add one more "base" overload that tolerated both. This doesn't reduce any of the nice type safety added in #816, but allows users to iterate over
ProviderEventscollections as seen in the new tests.