Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: fix comment in README for Hook’s after method #1103

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 10, 2024

Conversation

chrisllontop
Copy link
Contributor

@chrisllontop chrisllontop commented Dec 10, 2024

This PR

  • Fixes incorrect comment in the README for the Hook implementation's after method.

@chrisllontop chrisllontop requested a review from a team as a code owner December 10, 2024 19:01
@toddbaert
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@toddbaert toddbaert merged commit e335615 into open-feature:main Dec 10, 2024
5 checks passed
@chrisllontop chrisllontop deleted the patch-2 branch December 10, 2024 19:11
beeme1mr added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2024
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[1.17.0](server-sdk-v1.16.2...server-sdk-v1.17.0)
(2024-12-18)

### ⚠ BREAKING CHANGES

The signature of the `finally` hook stage has been changed. The
signature now includes the `evaluation details`, as per the [OpenFeature
specification](https://openfeature.dev/specification/sections/hooks#requirement-438).
Note that since hooks are still `experimental,` this does not constitute
a change requiring a new major version. To migrate, update any hook that
implements the `finally` stage to accept `evaluation details` as the
second argument.

* add evaluation details to finally hook
([#1087](#1087))
([2135254](2135254))

### ✨ New Features

* add evaluation details to finally hook
([#1087](#1087))
([2135254](2135254))


### 📚 Documentation

* fix comment in README for Hook’s after method
([#1103](#1103))
([e335615](e335615))


### 🔄 Refactoring

* improve track interface for providers
([#1100](#1100))
([5e5b160](5e5b160))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

---------

Signed-off-by: OpenFeature Bot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Beemer <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Michael Beemer <[email protected]>
kevinmlong pushed a commit to kevinmlong/openfeature-js-sdk that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2024
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[1.17.0](open-feature/js-sdk@server-sdk-v1.16.2...server-sdk-v1.17.0)
(2024-12-18)

### ⚠ BREAKING CHANGES

The signature of the `finally` hook stage has been changed. The
signature now includes the `evaluation details`, as per the [OpenFeature
specification](https://openfeature.dev/specification/sections/hooks#requirement-438).
Note that since hooks are still `experimental,` this does not constitute
a change requiring a new major version. To migrate, update any hook that
implements the `finally` stage to accept `evaluation details` as the
second argument.

* add evaluation details to finally hook
([open-feature#1087](open-feature#1087))
([2135254](open-feature@2135254))

### ✨ New Features

* add evaluation details to finally hook
([open-feature#1087](open-feature#1087))
([2135254](open-feature@2135254))


### 📚 Documentation

* fix comment in README for Hook’s after method
([open-feature#1103](open-feature#1103))
([e335615](open-feature@e335615))


### 🔄 Refactoring

* improve track interface for providers
([open-feature#1100](open-feature#1100))
([5e5b160](open-feature@5e5b160))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

---------

Signed-off-by: OpenFeature Bot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Beemer <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Michael Beemer <[email protected]>
wichopy pushed a commit to wichopy/openfeature-js-sdk that referenced this pull request Dec 31, 2024
## This PR

- Fixes incorrect comment in the README for the Hook implementation's
`after` method.

Signed-off-by: Christian Llontop <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Will Chou <[email protected]>
wichopy pushed a commit to wichopy/openfeature-js-sdk that referenced this pull request Dec 31, 2024
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---

##
[1.17.0](open-feature/js-sdk@server-sdk-v1.16.2...server-sdk-v1.17.0)
(2024-12-18)

### ⚠ BREAKING CHANGES

The signature of the `finally` hook stage has been changed. The
signature now includes the `evaluation details`, as per the [OpenFeature
specification](https://openfeature.dev/specification/sections/hooks#requirement-438).
Note that since hooks are still `experimental,` this does not constitute
a change requiring a new major version. To migrate, update any hook that
implements the `finally` stage to accept `evaluation details` as the
second argument.

* add evaluation details to finally hook
([open-feature#1087](open-feature#1087))
([2135254](open-feature@2135254))

### ✨ New Features

* add evaluation details to finally hook
([open-feature#1087](open-feature#1087))
([2135254](open-feature@2135254))

### 📚 Documentation

* fix comment in README for Hook’s after method
([open-feature#1103](open-feature#1103))
([e335615](open-feature@e335615))

### 🔄 Refactoring

* improve track interface for providers
([open-feature#1100](open-feature#1100))
([5e5b160](open-feature@5e5b160))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

---------

Signed-off-by: OpenFeature Bot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Beemer <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Michael Beemer <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Will Chou <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants