-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 666
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Proposal: Finer-Grained Shared Resources and Parallelism #1292
Comments
I did a quick read of the proposal and at face everything outlined seems like a great addition! I'll have more time to pick through it over the weekend to really think through the 👏🏽 |
Thanks for taking a look @XenoPhex ! |
I went through the proposal. Lot's of useful stuff, thanks for considering this change. I left one comment (just for clarification), the proposal itself looks good to me. |
Thanks @pohly ! |
Hi @onsi! The proposal looks very interesting. For me it would mean no more shuffling and ordering test suites, so that the actual tests are run after a test server is build and available for use and faster test runs because I don't have to serialize everything :) |
thanks @chombium - that’s exactly what i’m hoping this enables :) glad to hear you’re seeing it too :) |
Hi @onsi I like this! As a member of team that leverages Ginkgo heavily for integration/system/e2e type tests that rely on the |
thanks for taking a look @Dannyb48 ! now i just need to implement it all, lol! |
I'd like to propose some new behavior for Ginkgo and am looking for feedback. The intent here is to solve long-standing problems that keep recurring, particularly for users who build large complex integration suites (e.g. k8s e2e suites).
Please take a look at the proposal up on hackmd.io:
https://hackmd.io/@onsi/By32R9AfT
and either comment on the doc at the link or in the comments below.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: