Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
AuthAccount capabilities #53
AuthAccount capabilities #53
Changes from 2 commits
88785e2
1f2359f
8b7c584
d2ed02e
2372783
e46e753
f92446a
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I still think a nice supplement to this feature would a few "interface" supertypes defined for
AuthAccount
to slightly mitigate this drawback. If we could create/publish a capability to aStorageWriter
that only has access tolink
andsave
, or aContractUpdater
that can only add/remove contracts, it would be slightly safer to give someone access to this capability so they can, say, save a new value to your storage without also allowing them to remove all your contracts.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed, I had proposed this before and still would like to see such interfaces being added to the language, maybe as a separate proposal though, as they would also be useful without account capabilities.