Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Properly set base on loaded attachments during attachment iteration #2847

Merged
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion runtime/interpreter/interpreter_statement.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ func (interpreter *Interpreter) VisitRemoveStatement(removeStatement *ast.Remove

if attachment.IsResourceKinded(interpreter) {
// this attachment is no longer attached to its base, but the `base` variable is still available in the destructor
attachment.setBaseValue(interpreter, base, attachmentBaseAuthorization(interpreter, attachment))
attachment.setBaseValue(interpreter, base)
attachment.Destroy(interpreter, locationRange)
}

Expand Down
10 changes: 6 additions & 4 deletions runtime/interpreter/value.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -16513,7 +16513,7 @@ func (v *CompositeValue) Destroy(interpreter *Interpreter, locationRange Locatio
// is a necessary pre-requisite for calling any members of the attachment. However, in
// the case of a destructor, this is called implicitly, and thus must have its `base`
// set manually
attachment.setBaseValue(interpreter, v, attachmentBaseAuthorization(interpreter, attachment))
attachment.setBaseValue(interpreter, v)
attachment.Destroy(interpreter, locationRange)
})

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -17276,7 +17276,7 @@ func (v *CompositeValue) Transfer(
if compositeValue, ok := value.(*CompositeValue); ok &&
compositeValue.Kind == common.CompositeKindAttachment {

compositeValue.setBaseValue(interpreter, v, attachmentBaseAuthorization(interpreter, compositeValue))
compositeValue.setBaseValue(interpreter, v)
}

value = value.Transfer(
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -17594,7 +17594,7 @@ func (v *CompositeValue) getBaseValue() *EphemeralReferenceValue {
return v.base
}

func (v *CompositeValue) setBaseValue(interpreter *Interpreter, base *CompositeValue, authorization Authorization) {
func (v *CompositeValue) setBaseValue(interpreter *Interpreter, base *CompositeValue) {
attachmentType, ok := interpreter.MustSemaTypeOfValue(v).(*sema.CompositeType)
if !ok {
panic(errors.NewUnreachableError())
Expand All @@ -17608,6 +17608,7 @@ func (v *CompositeValue) setBaseValue(interpreter *Interpreter, base *CompositeV
baseType = ty
}

authorization := attachmentBaseAuthorization(interpreter, v)
v.base = NewEphemeralReferenceValue(interpreter, authorization, base, baseType)
interpreter.trackReferencedResourceKindedValue(base.StorageID(), base)
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -17762,6 +17763,7 @@ func (v *CompositeValue) forEachAttachment(interpreter *Interpreter, _ LocationR
// attachments is added that takes a `fun (&Attachment): Void` callback, the `f` provided here
// should convert the provided attachment value into a reference before passing it to the user
// callback
attachment.setBaseValue(interpreter, v)
turbolent marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
f(attachment)
}
}
Expand All @@ -17779,7 +17781,7 @@ func (v *CompositeValue) getTypeKey(
}
attachmentType := keyType.(*sema.CompositeType)
// dynamically set the attachment's base to this composite, but with authorization based on the requested access on that attachment
attachment.setBaseValue(interpreter, v, attachmentBaseAuthorization(interpreter, attachment))
attachment.setBaseValue(interpreter, v)

// Map the entitlements of the accessing reference through the attachment's entitlement map to get the authorization of this reference
attachmentReferenceAuth, err := attachmentReferenceAuthorization(interpreter, attachmentType, baseAccess)
Expand Down
34 changes: 34 additions & 0 deletions runtime/tests/interpreter/attachments_test.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2237,6 +2237,40 @@ func TestInterpretMutationDuringForEachAttachment(t *testing.T) {

AssertValuesEqual(t, inter, interpreter.NewUnmeteredIntValueFromInt64(3), value)
})

t.Run("callback", func(t *testing.T) {

t.Parallel()

inter := parseCheckAndInterpret(t, `
access(all) resource R {
let foo: Int
init() {
self.foo = 9
}
}
access(all) attachment A for R {
access(all) fun touchBase(): Int {
var foo = base.foo
return foo
}
}
access(all) fun main(): Int {
var r <- attach A() to <- create R()
var id: Int = 0
r.forEachAttachment(fun(a: &AnyResourceAttachment) {
id = (a as! &A).touchBase()
});
destroy r
return id
}
`)

value, err := inter.Invoke("main")
require.NoError(t, err)

AssertValuesEqual(t, inter, interpreter.NewUnmeteredIntValueFromInt64(9), value)
})
}

func TestInterpretBuiltinCompositeAttachment(t *testing.T) {
Expand Down
Loading