-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 137
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Interpreting for default events #2817
Interpreting for default events #2817
Conversation
…dence into sainati/default-event-interpreting
…dence into sainati/default-event-interpreting
@turbolent @SupunS this is the last PR necessary for removal of destructors |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice!
…e into sainati/default-event-interpreting
Cadence Benchstat comparisonThis branch with compared with the base branch onflow:feature/remove-destructors commit 1e79d89 Collapsed results for better readability
|
Codecov ReportAttention:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## feature/remove-destructors #2817 +/- ##
==============================================================
+ Coverage 79.97% 80.00% +0.03%
==============================================================
Files 344 344
Lines 81574 81708 +134
==============================================================
+ Hits 65240 65374 +134
Misses 14023 14023
Partials 2311 2311
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice, great work!
Thank you again for the sync, it clarified thins a lot 🙏
Co-authored-by: Bastian Müller <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good! Sorry, just one last things re: interpreter activations (and maybe also check checker activations)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great work!
@SupunS Can you please also have a look? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good!
Part of #2790
Reference implementation for onflow/flips#131, and as such will not be merged unless this FLIP is approved. This adds runtime support for default events
master
branchFiles changed
in the Github PR explorer