Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use Cilium instead of Metalllb for service loadbalancing #769

Closed
mrueg opened this issue Jun 3, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

Use Cilium instead of Metalllb for service loadbalancing #769

mrueg opened this issue Jun 3, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@mrueg
Copy link
Contributor

mrueg commented Jun 3, 2023

Since this project is now using Cilium, it might be good next step to remove one additional component needed and reduce complexity in the deployment.

See also: https://dariomader.io/post/how_i_moved_from_metallb_to_cilium/

@onedr0p
Copy link
Owner

onedr0p commented Jun 3, 2023

I would love to go this route and will do at home when I get Cilium running there. However L2 is still the most generic method of bringing up a cluster, adding BGP into the mix brings into issues with people who can't run BGP on their routers.

I will recommend people to go this route over L2 if possible but I'm not sure supporting it by default would be a good idea. And to let it be an option, adding different types of config options to the configure script is not really maintainable :/

See: #686

@onedr0p
Copy link
Owner

onedr0p commented Jun 12, 2023

@mrueg I converted the Cilium ingress request into a discussion and I am closing this in favor of the following discussion:

#686

@onedr0p onedr0p closed this as completed Jun 12, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants