-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Handle cryptography 3.4 #87
Comments
oy vey... If I understand correctly, there's no impact on end users? Since rolling |
I agree solution 2 is the less costly in terms of number of changes at once. I'll test it and report. Re impact on end users, I think the main one is that |
See sbesson/action-ome-ansible-molecule@77de549 now tested via https://github.com/sbesson/ansible-role-sudoers/actions/runs/547386811 for an implementation of option 2 |
Pushed https://github.com/ome/action-ome-ansible-molecule/releases/tag/v2.0.1 to fix the broken CI pipeline for roles and playbooks immediately. Will keep watching the upstream repositories to see if we need to implement others mitigation/upgrade the platforms. |
Looks like ansible will be doing this as well: ansible-community/antsibull-build@d9385c9 |
crytpography 3.4 released yesterday afternoon broke all the scheduled Molecule builds - see e.g. https://github.com/ome/ansible-role-sudoers/runs/1850565089
As discussed in pyca/cryptography#5753, the installation can be restored with a more recent version of pip.
This leaves us three options:
molecule.yml
to useruns-on: ubuntu-20.04
for the test phasepip install -U pip
before installing theome-ansible-molecule
packagecryptography
to 3.3.x in https://github.com/ome/ome-ansible-molecule for nowThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: