You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am trying to reproduce your results on miniImageNet and tieredImageNet. I can reproduce the result of S2M2 with the given rotation weights on miniImageNet. But when I train the rotation task by myself, the results can not the match the performance of the given rotation weights. I wonder whether you train the rotation with multi GPUs or there are other tricks. And I find that the fc dimension is 200 for miniImageNet, it is weird. I think it should be 64 for miniImageNet. Furthermore I do not find the rotation weight for tieredImageNet, could you kindly release the rotation weights for tieredImageNet?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, in case miniImageNet and tieredImageNet dataset with rotation self-supervision, we train for 400 and 100 epochs. Batch size is kept to 64 and train_aug flag is enabled during backbone training.
While evaluating on novel classes, only a linear network is trained on the backbone features. "Few-shot evaluation" section of the Readme mentions the commands for these. save_features.py saves the features and test.py trains a linear network over these features.
Hope this resolves the doubts regarding training and novel class evaluation.
I am trying to reproduce your results on miniImageNet and tieredImageNet. I can reproduce the result of S2M2 with the given rotation weights on miniImageNet. But when I train the rotation task by myself, the results can not the match the performance of the given rotation weights. I wonder whether you train the rotation with multi GPUs or there are other tricks. And I find that the fc dimension is 200 for miniImageNet, it is weird. I think it should be 64 for miniImageNet. Furthermore I do not find the rotation weight for tieredImageNet, could you kindly release the rotation weights for tieredImageNet?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: