-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 152
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
nunit-console and nunit-agent to support longPathAware #1367
Comments
It depends. If all libraries use with oath can handle them. I don't know if .NET Framework was ever updated |
@OsirisTerje @manfred-brands @poklau If changing the manifest makes an application long-path-aware, that's great. If, as I suspect, it merely tells the runtime that we are long-path-aware, then we need to make sure that's true before changing the manifests. Can anyone shed light on this? FWIW, I see this as similar to our |
@CharliePoole Not sure how I can create a test to cover this. |
That's good enough for me. :-) |
Merging this into version4 failed, probably because it has gotten a bit out of date. As this is simple, I'll just redo it in both main and version4. |
@poklau Actually, the merge of your PR turns out to have failed for an unrelated reason: one of the dependencies in our myget feed no longer existed, having been automatically purged. I fixed it along with applying your changes. |
It looks like NUnit console does not support tests with file path exceed MAX_PATH as per document here.
This should be as simple as making it long-path aware like this in app.manifest:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: