Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(js): remove ts implementation of ts processing #18752

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 23, 2023

Conversation

FrozenPandaz
Copy link
Collaborator

Current Behavior

There is a faster more accurate implementation of the typescript processing in rust AND an implementation of the typescript processing in typescript.

Expected Behavior

There is only the typescript processing in rust.

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Aug 21, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
nx-dev ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Aug 23, 2023 9:06pm

@FrozenPandaz FrozenPandaz changed the title chore(js): remove ts implementation of ts processing feat(js): remove ts implementation of ts processing Aug 21, 2023
@FrozenPandaz FrozenPandaz marked this pull request as ready for review August 22, 2023 14:04
@FrozenPandaz FrozenPandaz requested a review from a team as a code owner August 22, 2023 14:04
@FrozenPandaz FrozenPandaz requested a review from vsavkin August 22, 2023 14:04
@FrozenPandaz FrozenPandaz enabled auto-merge (squash) August 23, 2023 22:00
@FrozenPandaz FrozenPandaz merged commit 165250e into nrwl:master Aug 23, 2023
@FrozenPandaz FrozenPandaz deleted the rm-js-ts branch August 23, 2023 22:04
@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has already been merged/closed. If you experience issues related to these changes, please open a new issue referencing this pull request.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 29, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants