Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Noto Serif Tibetan glyphs and line height too large? #23

Closed
josephrocca opened this issue May 6, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

Noto Serif Tibetan glyphs and line height too large? #23

josephrocca opened this issue May 6, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@josephrocca
Copy link

josephrocca commented May 6, 2022

Defect Report

Font

NotoSerifTibetan-Regular.ttf

Where the font came from, and when

Site: https://fonts.google.com/download?family=Noto%20Serif%20Tibetan
Date: 2022-05-06

Noto_Serif_Tibetan.zip

Font Version

2.001

OS name and version

Ubuntu 20.04

Application name and version

Chrome Linux v100

Issue

The glyphs and line height are significantly larger than two other Tibetan fonts that I tested at the same specified font size.

Here's an example comparing it to the 'Jomolhari' font:

https://jsbin.com/zicanemivi/edit?html,output

Character data

Just some example text: ༝ འགབམ

Screenshot

image

@simoncozens simoncozens transferred this issue from notofonts/noto-fonts Jun 21, 2022
@simoncozens
Copy link
Contributor

I don't think this is a problem. I'd say that conversely the glyphs in Jomolhari are too small, especially when you look at them in relationship to the Latin glyphs as in your example.

@simoncozens simoncozens closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Apr 27, 2023
@josephrocca
Copy link
Author

@simoncozens Fair, but are you sure it needs all that line height?

@simoncozens
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, because of the (high) possibility of stacking. At any rate, we set vertical metrics according to our best practices guide.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants