We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Aim: Codin' up some noir
Using some snazzy equality operators
Type on left hand matches left expression Type on right hand matches right expression
ie: Types in a binary operation should match, but found Field and Option<ValueNote>
Types in a binary operation should match, but found Field and Option<ValueNote>
Type on left hand matches right expression Type on right hand matches left expression
ie: Types in a binary operation should match, but found Option<ValueNote> and Field
Types in a binary operation should match, but found Option<ValueNote> and Field
None
No response
No
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for flagging this. This is fixed in #2353
Sorry, something went wrong.
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Aim
Aim: Codin' up some noir
Using some snazzy equality operators
Expected Behavior
Type on left hand matches left expression
Type on right hand matches right expression
ie:
Types in a binary operation should match, but found Field and Option<ValueNote>
Bug
Type on left hand matches right expression
Type on right hand matches left expression
ie:
Types in a binary operation should match, but found Option<ValueNote> and Field
To Reproduce
Installation Method
None
Nargo Version
No response
Additional Context
No response
Would you like to submit a PR for this Issue?
No
Support Needs
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: