Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LSP: Support codelens #1834

Closed
Tracked by #1558
phated opened this issue Jun 28, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #2330
Closed
Tracked by #1558

LSP: Support codelens #1834

phated opened this issue Jun 28, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #2330
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request lsp Language Server Protocol

Comments

@phated
Copy link
Contributor

phated commented Jun 28, 2023

Problem

The LSP should support codelenses following https://microsoft.github.io/language-server-protocol/specifications/lsp/3.17/specification/#textDocument_codeLens

The first iteration will show > Run Test above tests inside of noir source code and follow up work can add > Prove and Verify above main functions.

Happy Case

A user should see codelenses in their source code while using a LSP client that will allow them to take some action against the code they are writing.

Alternatives Considered

No response

Additional Context

No response

Would you like to submit a PR for this Issue?

Yes

Support Needs

No response

@phated phated added enhancement New feature or request lsp Language Server Protocol labels Jun 28, 2023
@phated phated self-assigned this Jun 28, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to 📋 Backlog in Noir Jun 28, 2023
@kevaundray
Copy link
Contributor

Might be better to have execute instead of prove and verify initially -- the former is faster and would not rely on a backend

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request lsp Language Server Protocol
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants