Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 9, 2024. It is now read-only.

feat(acir)!: Verify Proof #291

Merged
merged 27 commits into from
Jun 6, 2023
Merged

feat(acir)!: Verify Proof #291

merged 27 commits into from
Jun 6, 2023

Conversation

vezenovm
Copy link
Contributor

@vezenovm vezenovm commented May 17, 2023

Related issue(s)

Resolves #198

The acvm-backend-barretenberg PR which implements this can be found here:
noir-lang/acvm-backend-barretenberg#207
The relevant Noir PR which implements this and the backend PR can be found here:
noir-lang/noir#1491

Description

Add VerifyProof variant to BlackBoxFunc enum

Summary of changes

(Describe the changes in this PR. Point out breaking changes if any.)

Dependency additions / changes

(If applicable.)

Test additions / changes

(If applicable.)

Checklist

  • I have tested the changes locally.
  • I have formatted the changes with Prettier and/or cargo fmt with default settings.
  • I have linked this PR to the issue(s) that it resolves.
  • I have reviewed the changes on GitHub, line by line.
  • I have ensured all changes are covered in the description.

Additional context

(If applicable.)

@vezenovm vezenovm changed the base branch from master to kw/back-to-serde May 17, 2023 18:16
Base automatically changed from kw/back-to-serde to master May 19, 2023 08:30
@vezenovm vezenovm marked this pull request as ready for review May 22, 2023 13:51
Copy link
Contributor

@kevaundray kevaundray left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Generally looks okay -- Some overall questions:

  • Can you give a brief outline as to how this opcode will be used from the user perspective? (I'm trying to understand the rationale behind this interface)

  • The size of the aggregation objects can change depending on the proving system, where do we account for this?

@vezenovm vezenovm requested a review from kevaundray May 23, 2023 18:28
acvm/src/lib.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@vezenovm vezenovm requested a review from kevaundray May 26, 2023 14:41
Copy link
Contributor

@kevaundray kevaundray left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks okay

@kevaundray kevaundray added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 6, 2023
Merged via the queue into master with commit 9f34428 Jun 6, 2023
@kevaundray kevaundray mentioned this pull request Jun 6, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add recursion opcode
3 participants