-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test,http: check that http server is robust from handler abuse #37958
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nodejs-github-bot
added
needs-ci
PRs that need a full CI run.
test
Issues and PRs related to the tests.
labels
Mar 28, 2021
cjihrig
approved these changes
Mar 30, 2021
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
jasnell
approved these changes
Apr 6, 2021
The only way I could find to complete coverage for _http_common.js is to use semi-private (exposed but probably shouldn't be) handlers to get the state into something weird. With the if-condition being checked (see Refs) commented out, I get this result from this test: ``` node:_http_common:140 if (len > 0 && !stream._dumped) { ^ TypeError: Cannot read property '_dumped' of null at HTTPParser.parserOnBody (node:_http_common:140:26) ``` With the check in place, the test passes without an error. Seems like quite the edge case, but I'm going to assume it's there for a reason. Refs: https://coverage.nodejs.org/coverage-b560645d6b0a4bed/lib/_http_common.js.html#L137 PR-URL: nodejs#37958 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Trott
force-pushed
the
robust-from-tampering
branch
from
April 8, 2021 12:21
5c84d96
to
0da7a11
Compare
Landed in 0da7a11 |
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 1, 2021
The only way I could find to complete coverage for _http_common.js is to use semi-private (exposed but probably shouldn't be) handlers to get the state into something weird. With the if-condition being checked (see Refs) commented out, I get this result from this test: ``` node:_http_common:140 if (len > 0 && !stream._dumped) { ^ TypeError: Cannot read property '_dumped' of null at HTTPParser.parserOnBody (node:_http_common:140:26) ``` With the check in place, the test passes without an error. Seems like quite the edge case, but I'm going to assume it's there for a reason. Refs: https://coverage.nodejs.org/coverage-b560645d6b0a4bed/lib/_http_common.js.html#L137 PR-URL: #37958 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The only way I could find to complete coverage for _http_common.js is to
use semi-private (exposed but probably shouldn't be) handlers to get the
state into something weird. With the if-condition being checked (see
Refs) commented out, I get this result from this test:
With the check in place, the test passes without an error. Seems like
quite the edge case, but I'm going to assume it's there for a reason.
Refs: https://coverage.nodejs.org/coverage-b560645d6b0a4bed/lib/_http_common.js.html#L137