-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ada's license #47894
Comments
If something is dual-licensed (or triple-licensed), you can pick the license you want - in our case MIT. It couldn't be any other way because the MPL is a no-go for a MIT-licensed project like Node.js. |
@bnoordhuis a small portion of ada/idna uses mozilla licensed code. should we focus on replacing it with a mit-based solution? |
Does that code exist in this repository? Adding code to |
The ada README can be useful... https://github.com/ada-url/ada#license It is not hard for us to eliminate the UniLib code, it was integrated to save time but could be rewritten from scratch easily. |
Yes, it's present in Lines 2853 to 2863 in 6fb10ca
|
@lemire removed UniLib code from Ada. we'll soon release |
Ada had 2 license files -
LICENSE-APACHE
andLICENSE-MIT
from the initial commit but when Ada was added to Node.js in #46410, only the MIT license of Ada was added to the Node.js'LICENSE
file. Is this intentional or should we also add Ada's Apache license to the Node.js license?Also, the license section on Ada's readme, which was added in ada-url/ada#328, says:
So should we also include a copy of Mozilla Public License Version 2.0?
cc @anonrig @lemire
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: