-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rename possibly offensive terminology in child_process #14444
Comments
ImpactSince it is internal code, I think we can just remove it safely from here (and other places). To be on the safe side I did a GitHub search. Looking at https://github.com/search?l=JavaScript&q=%22Child+died%22&type=Code&utf8=%E2%9C%93 - there certainly are usages of the terminology (or have a fork of node in their repo), but nothing relying on anything internal (I went through the 'child dead' search too). I don't see anyone relying on it or using it any way. (Warning, the search results contain some jokes one might consider very offensive). I'm confident we can do it as semver-patch in all cases that are test related. Any objections? |
+1 for semver-patch. |
Sounds good, just make sure not to use "exited" unless it specifically refers to a process exiting. Processes (on unix) can terminate via exit, or terminate via signal. Terminate is the generic technical term used in the man pages to cover both cases, see discussion of WIFEXITED vs WIFSIGNALED in http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/waitpid.2.html. |
Hi, Killing the child just does not sound right :/ [1] https://nodejs.org/dist/latest-v6.x/docs/api/child_process.html#child_process_child_kill_signal |
@fastman It maps 1-to-1 to the system call of the same name. |
I'm with @bnoordhuis here, while I'm not a fan of the name unix chose for signals - |
@benjamingr Maybe at least we could change the wording in the documentation? [1] @bnoordhuis |
Nor should creating a set of "Node.js-specific terminology" against established tradition be our modus operandi, IMHO. There are multiple duties (in a deontological sense) at play here:
Where we draw the line between 1 and 2/3 is of course the good ol' problem of virtue ethics. The OP does not have concern 2), which is a big reason why I am in support of it. It also does not correspond to a syscall or UNIX command, rather derived artificially. The "suicide" flag did have concern 2) in play, but since again it does not correspond to a syscall, and the word is somewhat more disturbing than Of course, this is all subjective, but as multiple members of the community have shown the proposal does have objections against it. I would be okay with adding a |
@TimothyGu What do you think about changing the wording in the documentation? +1 for the alias of course! |
I'd like to see the discussion about the possibility of renaming |
@benjamingr has this progressed? If not might I suggest a solution similar to #14578 — replace the term |
@refack that sounds like a good idea. To be honest I completely forgot about this issue 0_0 If you want to (and have time) to PR this be my guest - otherwise probably next weekend. |
This was resolved a while ago. |
Currently, we use the terminology "Child died" when child processed get terminated.
We discussed the terminology in #14293 (comment) , copying my comment from there:
@jasnell suggested we change the terminology to "Child exited". I agree it's better terminology, in general I think we should avoid irrelevant stuff that might cause people to feel uneasy (like death related terminology in code) where we can and I think it could help keep the project friendly and inclusive.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: