Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
doc: add TypeScript execution requirements
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Add section with high level approach/requirements for
enabling TypeScript execution as discussed in the Next-10
[TypeScript mini-summit](nodejs/next-10#150)

Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>

PR-URL: #44030
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
  • Loading branch information
mhdawson authored and targos committed Sep 5, 2022
1 parent d61e87b commit 00648e3
Showing 1 changed file with 59 additions and 1 deletion.
60 changes: 59 additions & 1 deletion doc/contributing/maintaining-types-for-nodejs.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ code of their JavaScript projects. While many people don't annotate their code,
or make use of annotations at all, there are enough who do that the project has
agreed it's important to work towards having [suitable types for end-users][].

## High level approach
## High level approach - maintaining types

There are a number of ways that types could be maintained for Node.js ranging
from shipping them with the Node.js runtime to having them be externally
Expand All @@ -28,6 +28,64 @@ The agreement was that the ideal flow would be as follows:
* Automation within external type projects consumes the JSON and automatically
generates a PR to add the API.

## High level approach - development workflow

The number of people using TypeScript with Node.js is significant enough
that providing a good developer experience is important. While TypeScript
is identified specifically, a secondary goal is that what we provide to improve
development experience with TypeScript would apply to other type
systems and transpiled languages as well.

We have agreed that the approach will **NOT** include bundling TypeScript
tools with Node.js but instead improve the developer experience for how
those tools are installed/configured to work with Node.js.

The high level developer experience we are working towards was captured in the
[next-10 TypeScript mini-summit](https://github.com/nodejs/next-10/pull/150)
and is as follows:

1. When Node.js is started with an entry point that is not a file type that
Node.js recognizes, for example `node script.ts`, an informative error
message is printed that directs users to a webpage where they can
learn how to configure Node.js to support that file type.
* If the file was a TypeScript file, a TypeScript specific message with a
reference to a link on Nodejs.org specific on learning how to
configure TypeScript will be provided.
* For other file types a generic message and shared webpage will be
used.
2. Node.js gains support for loading configuration from a file. Most, if not
all, of the configuration supported by `NODE_OPTIONS` would be
supported in this file (which might be the `package.json` that lives
near the entry point file). The webpage with instructions would tell
users what configuration to put in this file to get Node.js to support
their file type.
3. When Node.js is run with the correct configuration, either in a file or
`NODE_OPTIONS` or flags, the unknown file type is executed as expected.

Some additional specifics around the current approach include:

* Loaders already provide a number of the components needed to
satisfy the requirements above. They already provide the Node.js
options that are needed to achieve many of the requirements above.
* `package.json` as the location for the config is potentially a good
choice as Node.js already looks for it as part of startup.
* The implementation chosen should allow for different configuration
in/for different environments/conditions such as production
versus development, or different types of hosted environments
such as serverless vs traditional, etc.; Node.js would not make
any recommendations or have any expectations as to what the
separate configuration blocks should be named or what their
purposes should be, just that a configuration file should have
the ability to provide different configurations for user-defined
conditions.
* There is no plan to define a default tsconfig.json for all Node.js users
* We don't have consensus on provding an opinionated default but
that should be explored after the initial steps are complete.
* It will be important that as part of the messaging around this
functionality that we avoid confusion that could lead people to ship
TypeScript files (e.g. `script.ts`) instead of the processed files
(e.g. `script.js`).

## Generation/Consumption of machine readable JSON files

When you run `make doc` the canonical markdown files used to
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 00648e3

Please sign in to comment.