-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 739
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixes regression introduced by #719 #734
Conversation
Can't believe I missed this! Thanks for cleaning up after me and adding the test case for this regression 👍 |
@ltegman No problem! 🍻 |
A fixed 9.0.x would be great :) |
@vrinek Any thoughts? |
Thanks for the fix! |
Fixes regression introduced by #719
Just published in v8.2.1 & v9.0.1 🎉 /cc @aredridel |
Thank you so much! Tests pass for us with those! |
This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue and add a reference to this one if it’s related. Thank you! |
This adds a test for empty objects in the body and spec.
It also fixes a regression that would cause the library to throw an error if an empty object was passed in the body.
CC @vrinek