You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm trying to work with inputs that have the following shapes:
mesh coordinates: x, y, z
mesh level scalar parameters: e.g: A=10, B=12, C=150, D=20
I changed scalar parameters to vectors using np.full and stacked them with x, y, z vertices to make a 7 Dim input C_in
x_in = torch.stack([x,y,z, A, B, C, D]
It works fine but I was wondering if that is the right way or is there a better way to include mesh level input parameters.
Because with my current implementation I'm not sure if the network is able to capture the effects of A,B,C,D on the output and seems like a waste of computational power.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This sounds like pretty a good way to include mesh-level input parameters to me. You want them to be inputs to each of the pointwise MLPs, and this accomplishes that. The added computational cost should be small, since it only makes the first linear layer slightly larger.
Thanks for sharing your awesome work.
I'm trying to work with inputs that have the following shapes:
mesh coordinates: x, y, z
mesh level scalar parameters: e.g:
A=10, B=12, C=150, D=20
I changed scalar parameters to vectors using
np.full
and stacked them with x, y, z vertices to make a 7 Dim inputC_in
x_in = torch.stack([x,y,z, A, B, C, D]
It works fine but I was wondering if that is the right way or is there a better way to include mesh level input parameters.
Because with my current implementation I'm not sure if the network is able to capture the effects of A,B,C,D on the output and seems like a waste of computational power.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: