-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
JSON performance benchmark comparision #177
Comments
It's in there. However, the test was run almost 9 months ago, so it's with an old version. |
I overlook the entry |
Hi @xor-gate, thanks for opening an issue - I am really looking forward to seeing results! (Though I know the code is not designed having efficiency in mind...) |
@nlohmann there is always a tradeoff with cleanliness and speed. |
I know. But C++ developers seem to only care about speed ;) |
Or to put it differently: Cleanliness/simplicity is harder to quantify than objective criteria like runtime and memory consumption. |
Apparently, the benchmark has been updated to version 1.0.0: miloyip/nativejson-benchmark@7ca51bd - I haven't seen the results yet, though. |
I would be nice to see how well your JSON library compares with others:
https://github.com/miloyip/nativejson-benchmark
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: