You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now the only possible eta values are slicer or file:
[telegram_ui]
#eta_source: slicer# You can choose, which value to use for remaining time estimation.# Default value is slicer.# Allowed values: slicer, file
Klipper can calculate a third eta value based on the middle value of filament and file. In my case, this is one of the most presicely eta calculation i can get. While slicer eta time shows me a value of 0:05:35, the average value of file (0:09:44) and filament (0:03:20) give me a eta value of 0:06:32 which is in fact accurate to the second.
Maybe it's a opportunity to add a third value filament to the moonraker-telegram-bot and let the user decide which numbers should be combined and determine the average value from this. Like, adding multiple values leads to a average calculation: eta_source: file, filament
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you for writing such a detailed feature request, it's so refreshing :)
What I am wondering though, I have not had time to check, are you sure it's a klipper thing?
The slicer and filament variables are pulled from moonraker, we do not touch them ourselves.
Is this "middle" thing a new addition which we missed? If it is, adding it should be easy. If it is not, I am not sure if we want to add it. We want to keep the amount of calculations/things we do ourselves to a necessary minimum, because the bot is not an active component of the ecosystem, but rather a displaying/controlling entity.
I can't tell you if this calculation is from klipper or moonraker. Maybe it's a mainsail related feature? In my setup, I am using klipper with mainsail. In mainsail you can go to settings and there is a section for eta. Mainsail ask on which base the eta should be calculated and you can choose between different sources (file, filament, slicer). At exactly this step you can also choose more than one source to calculate an average value.
What would you like to see added?
Right now the only possible eta values are
slicer
orfile
:Klipper can calculate a third eta value based on the middle value of
filament
andfile
. In my case, this is one of the most presicely eta calculation i can get. Whileslicer
eta time shows me a value of0:05:35
, the average value offile
(0:09:44
) andfilament
(0:03:20
) give me a eta value of0:06:32
which is in fact accurate to the second.Maybe it's a opportunity to add a third value
filament
to themoonraker-telegram-bot
and let the user decide which numbers should be combined and determine the average value from this. Like, adding multiple values leads to a average calculation:eta_source: file, filament
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: