You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was getting the following error message when I use 172 group WIMS energy group structure as the input energy grid option in ERRORR using ign=1 error in colapsngout group structure does not span union grid.
To resolve this, first I used ign=18 which is inbuilt 172 group xmas group structure. Using this option, the njoy run smoothly completed. I took these energy group boundaries from the output and give the run again with ign=1 option. This time njoy run again terminated with the above error message.
A closer view of the two energy group structures in the output files shows that with ign=1 option, the energy group boundaries are approximated to four significant places after decimal even if more significant digits are present in the input option. This doesn’t happen with inbuilt ign=18 option. The modification to four significant digits has reduced one group from union structure – 839 groups for ign=1 option vs 840 groups for ign=18 option.
Can developers confirm whether is this the reason for above error message? How to solve it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I was getting the following error message when I use 172 group WIMS energy group structure as the input energy grid option in ERRORR using ign=1
error in colapsngout group structure does not span union grid.
To resolve this, first I used ign=18 which is inbuilt 172 group xmas group structure. Using this option, the njoy run smoothly completed. I took these energy group boundaries from the output and give the run again with ign=1 option. This time njoy run again terminated with the above error message.
A closer view of the two energy group structures in the output files shows that with ign=1 option, the energy group boundaries are approximated to four significant places after decimal even if more significant digits are present in the input option. This doesn’t happen with inbuilt ign=18 option. The modification to four significant digits has reduced one group from union structure – 839 groups for ign=1 option vs 840 groups for ign=18 option.
Can developers confirm whether is this the reason for above error message? How to solve it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: