-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 676
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
sendmmsg() in v0.26 do not support different content in control messages among messages #1954
Comments
@pacak any idea on this. If we can confirm this is truly a problem. I can try to make a fix. |
The comment says that control messages are shared and that's what the code does I'm afraid. I guess |
@pacak thanks for the confirmation. I'll try to make a fix to allow individual |
Could you please paste a sample of some code that worked with the old implementation but not with the new? Maybe we should revert that PR. |
A working code sample would be great, I can change current code to support old behavior. |
I don't have a specific code in mind, but for example it is very useful to be able to send multiple messages with a different TxTime message. |
Sorry guys, I didn't find time to work on this. For an working example, I cannot copy-paste my code, but this is the pseudo code showing the use case: type Item = (bytes, peer_addr, local_addr);
let recv_queue: VecDeque<Item> = VecDeque::with_capacity(BUF_LEN);
let send_queue: VecDeque<Item> = VecDeque::with_capacity(BUF_LEN);
// Get per-msg local addr from CMSG of each msg.
let incoming: Vec<Item> = match recvmmsg(sock.as_raw_fd(), &mut data, msg_flags, None) { ... };
... push incoming items to the recv_queue
... processing in another thread
let responses = send_queue.iter().take(BATCH_LEN);
// Write per-msg local addr to a CMSG for each SendMmsgData
let send_data: Vec<SendMmsgData<IoSlice, ControlMessage, SocketaddrStorage>> = make_responses_into_send_data();
let results = match sendmmsg(sock, send_data, MsgFlags::empty()) { ... }; Basically, for each individual |
Okay, I get the idea. Will try to make a change to support it too. |
@pacak Any news on this? Can we help in some way? |
No news yet, this change is next in the priority queue, will hopefully make some progress this weekend. |
It was much smaller change than I expected originally, sorry for taking this much time. |
For a UDP server program, it is very useful to use
sendmmsg()
andrecvmmsg()
to improve the performance by reducing syscalls.And it is not a uncommon setup that a single socket can receive IP packets with difference destination addresses. In this type of setup, we obtain the real destination addresses of messages from the
Ipv4PacketInfo
/Ipv6PacketInfo
control message when usingrecvmmsg()
. Corresponding to that,Ipv4PacketInfo
/Ipv6PacketInfo
control messages are used to set source addresss when sending out multiple messages at once viasendmmsg()
.In the breaking change introduced by 0.26 about
sendmmsg()
api (#1744), it seems it was assumed that control messages are shared/same across all the messages in the batch, I think this is a false assumption.Did I read the code wrong? If so, is there any example of how to use the new API correctly in this use case.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: