You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We ran MRIQC in docker to get a report on multi-shell diffusion data (1 scan of b=0, 64 scans of b=1500 and 64 scans of b=3000). For shell1 (b=1500), we got same snr values for best and worst volumes. However, for shell2 (b=3000), we got a high snr for best volume and low snr for worst volume. See the screenshot below.
@HQHuang could you share this particular image? If not, have you opened the file and checked whether it looks generally good (meaning, that the b-1500 is not always the same or something weird).
@oesteban Thank you for the reply! The 64 images from shell1 (b=1500) look different from each other. The whole diffusion file is too large to be uploaded here. Here I attached the screenshots of the first two volumes in shell1. Please let me know if you need further information!
What happened?
We ran MRIQC in docker to get a report on multi-shell diffusion data (1 scan of b=0, 64 scans of b=1500 and 64 scans of b=3000). For shell1 (b=1500), we got same snr values for best and worst volumes. However, for shell2 (b=3000), we got a high snr for best volume and low snr for worst volume. See the screenshot below.
What command did you use?
What version of the software are you running?
24.1.0.dev0+g3fe90466.d20240417
How are you running this software?
Docker
Is your data BIDS valid?
Yes
Are you reusing any previously computed results?
No
Please copy and paste any relevant log output.
No response
Additional information / screenshots
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: