Snapshot content of version files instead of a hash

[edmundmiller]

Currently we're snapshoting the versions.yml and getting a hash:

modules/modules/nf-core/ale/tests/main.nf.test.snap

Lines 26 to 28 in 17b8bed

	"versions": [
	"versions.yml:md5,949da9c6297b613b50e24c421576f3f1"
	]

                "versions": [
-                    "versions.yml:md5,949da9c6297b613b50e24c421576f3f1"
+                    "content": ["{ALE={ale=20180904}}"],
                ]

[edmundmiller]

@nvnieuwk Pointed out that topic channels won't be hashable

#4517

[famosab]

How exactly would we assert for the versions then? I tried something like this:

{ assert snapshot(
             process.out,
             file(process.out.versions[0]).readLines()
             ).match()
}

We might need to adapt the linting or snapshot both md5 and the content. Otherwise this error occurs:

╭─ [✗] 1 Module Test Failed ───────────────────────────────────────────────────╮
│              ╷                               ╷                               │
│ Module name  │ File path                     │ Test message                  │
│╶─────────────┼───────────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────╴│
│ wgsim        │ modules/nf-core/wgsim/tests/… │ versions not found in         │
│              │                               │ snapshot file                 │
│              ╵                               ╵                               │
╰──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯
╭───────────────────────╮
│ LINT RESULTS SUMMARY  │
├───────────────────────┤
│ [✔]  50 Tests Passed  │
│ [!]   0 Test Warnings │
│ [✗]   1 Test Failed   │
╰───────────────────────╯
Error: Process completed with exit code 1.

Of course only if we do not assert process.out completely

{ assert snapshot(
             process.out.fastq[0][1].collect { file(it).name },
             file(process.out.versions[0]).readLines(),
             ).match()
}

Maybe there is a more elegant way?

[edmundmiller]

We might need to adapt the linting or snapshot both md5 and the content. Otherwise this error occurs:

Luckily, we make the rules of the linter so we can ignore any errors like that and fix it right after we settle on a standard!

I like file(process.out.versions[0]).readLines() but let me see what the snapshot looks like.

Ideally I'd love for it to look like

"sarscov2 [fasta_gz] - paired-end sorted bam": {
        "content": [
            {
                "0": [
                    [
                        {
                            "id": "test",
                            "single_end": false
                        },
                        "test_ALEoutput.txt:md5,4abcbd60ae1dbf78138c97e5fed97f3e"
                    ]
                ],
                "1": [
                    "versions.yml:md5,949da9c6297b613b50e24c421576f3f1"
                ],
                "ale": [
                    [
                        {
                            "id": "test",
                            "single_end": false
                        },
                        "test_ALEoutput.txt:md5,4abcbd60ae1dbf78138c97e5fed97f3e"
                    ]
                ],
-                "versions": [
-                    "versions.yml:md5,949da9c6297b613b50e24c421576f3f1"
-                ]
+                "versions": {
+                    "ale": "20180904"
+                }
            }
        ],
        "meta": {
            "nf-test": "0.8.4",
            "nextflow": "23.10.1"
        },
        "timestamp": "2024-03-19T09:06:19.589167"
    },

[edmundmiller]

Maybe there is a more elegant way?

I think we could write a lib function for this, either in this repo or the nf-test/utils plugin.

Two other things to consider:

1. Migration to topic channels #4517 I think we need to see how these look when snapshotted.
2. Renovate Workflow  #4306 and the automated bumping of conda dependancies coming soon™️. I was just thinking about this and I'm proposing maybe we move to just getting the versions through the stub workflow. This would:
   A) Make running them actually test something besides stub functionality
   B) Allow us to do nf-test test --tag stub --update-snapshot ... in CI to automatically bump the version snapshot, and then run the actual tests without the fear of bumping any real test outputs that aren't the version. I haven't found a better way around this without requesting specific snapshot updates in nf-test itself.

[SPPearce]

Maybe there is a more elegant way?

I think we could write a lib function for this, either in this repo or the nf-test/utils plugin.

Two other things to consider:

1. Migration to topic channels #4517 I think we need to see how these look when snapshotted.
2. Renovate Workflow  #4306 and the automated bumping of conda dependancies coming soon™️. I was just thinking about this and I'm proposing maybe we move to just getting the versions through the stub workflow. This would:
   A) Make running them actually test something besides stub functionality
   B) Allow us to do nf-test test --tag stub --update-snapshot ... in CI to automatically bump the version snapshot, and then run the actual tests without the fear of bumping any real test outputs that aren't the version. I haven't found a better way around this without requesting specific snapshot updates in nf-test itself.

I definitely support snapshoting the version information itself, think that is much clearer than the md5sum. The stub test could get the versions, it only needs to be once, that sounds reasonable. And every module should have a stub and stub test (eventually), so sounds good to me.

[edmundmiller]

There's a function for yaml files in nf-test(that may have snuck in with 0.9.0) https://www.nf-test.com/docs/assertions/files/

[edmundmiller]

Magic line is:

{ assert snapshot(path(process.out.versions.get(0)).yaml).match("versions") },

[edmundmiller]

askimed/nf-test#197