Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider adding checkM to the pipeline #326

Closed
jfy133 opened this issue Jul 18, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Consider adding checkM to the pipeline #326

jfy133 opened this issue Jul 18, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@jfy133
Copy link
Member

jfy133 commented Jul 18, 2022

Description of feature

CheckM is been updated to allow 'custom' paths to internal databases. We could now try adding it to the pipeline (Again)

@jfy133 jfy133 added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 18, 2022
@maxibor
Copy link
Member

maxibor commented Aug 19, 2022

Checkm2 is (kind of) out (preprint, repo), and from a brief look at the code, it looks that they reproduced the same mistake with singularity.
But it's been caught early enough (chklovski/CheckM2#15), so hopefully by the time they release, it should work fine with singularity

So I would suggest waiting for the fix and the release, and then integrate directly checkm2 instead.

@jfy133
Copy link
Member Author

jfy133 commented Jan 17, 2023

Done!

@jfy133 jfy133 closed this as completed Jan 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants