Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Display rack utilisation #877

Closed
candlerb opened this issue Feb 7, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Display rack utilisation #877

candlerb opened this issue Feb 7, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@candlerb
Copy link
Contributor

candlerb commented Feb 7, 2017

When listing racks, display space utilisation (units used / total height). Preferably nice coloured bars like aggregate utilisation does.

A little care is needed with front/back mounting. I think you could overlay bars. Suppose you have 6U where both front and back are used, another 6U where only front are used, and 10U where only back are used. This is 6U (both) and 10U (maximum of front-only or back-only), giving utilisation of 16U, and could display as:

XXXXXXxxxxxxxxxx........
 |        |
both   front-or-back only

This is less than perfect, since adding a 4U box may not be possible without serious juggling if the available space is 4 x 1U. However, a figure for the largest contiguous gap could also be shown.

Relates to reserving rack space (#36), floorplan visualisation (#114)

@jeremystretch
Copy link
Member

There's a lot of overhead in calculating utilized rack space. We already report on percentage of free space available; I'm pretty happy with that.

@candlerb
Copy link
Contributor Author

candlerb commented Feb 7, 2017

We already report on percentage of free space available

OK, operator error - I didn't find it initially. Thanks.

@candlerb candlerb closed this as completed Feb 7, 2017
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 19, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants