Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add poe_enabled check box to dcim.interface #8487

Closed
davama opened this issue Jan 28, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

Add poe_enabled check box to dcim.interface #8487

davama opened this issue Jan 28, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
type: feature Introduction of new functionality to the application

Comments

@davama
Copy link
Contributor

davama commented Jan 28, 2022

NetBox version

v3.1.6

Feature type

Data model extension

Proposed functionality

Similar to enabled which defines the state of the interface, I wish to add a new checkbox to show if poe is enabled/disabled on X interface.

Use case

How will it benefit?
It will provide more data to the user on the state of their network.
What need does it address?
Currently there is no location where one can store the POE state of an interface, so this would add that.

poe_enabled

Database changes

ALTER TABLE dcim_interface ADD COLUMN "poe_enabled" BOOLEAN NOT NULL DEFAULT FALSE ;
commit

External dependencies

None

@davama davama added the type: feature Introduction of new functionality to the application label Jan 28, 2022
@davama
Copy link
Contributor Author

davama commented Jan 28, 2022

Please let me know if i missed anything on this request.
Thank you for the awesome support!

@DanSheps DanSheps added the status: under review Further discussion is needed to determine this issue's scope and/or implementation label Jan 28, 2022
@jeremystretch
Copy link
Member

Anything regarding PoE should be covered under FR #1099 (currently planned for v3.3). I want to avoid adding anything ahead of the "full" implementation so as not to constrain ourselves with its design unnecessarily. Thanks for the FR though!

@jeremystretch jeremystretch removed the status: under review Further discussion is needed to determine this issue's scope and/or implementation label Jan 28, 2022
@davama
Copy link
Contributor Author

davama commented Jan 28, 2022

Didnt know that FR one existed
Looks more complete.
Looking forward to it!

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 29, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
type: feature Introduction of new functionality to the application
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants