Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Tags field missing from device/VM component creation forms #2414

Closed
jeremystretch opened this issue Sep 6, 2018 · 0 comments
Closed

Tags field missing from device/VM component creation forms #2414

jeremystretch opened this issue Sep 6, 2018 · 0 comments
Labels
status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application

Comments

@jeremystretch
Copy link
Member

Environment

  • Python version: 3.5.2
  • NetBox version: 2.4.4

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Click the button to add an interface to a device

Expected Behavior

The interface creation form should include a tags field.

Observed Behavior

The tags field is absent. Tags may be added by creating the interface, then editing it.
@jeremystretch jeremystretch added type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation labels Sep 6, 2018
@jord-bh jord-bh mentioned this issue Sep 7, 2018
Closed
@jeremystretch jeremystretch changed the title Tags field missing from interface creation form Tags field missing from device/VM component creation forms Sep 28, 2018
@jeremystretch jeremystretch mentioned this issue Oct 2, 2018
Merged
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 17, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@jeremystretch