Swagger API doc has incorrect documentation for VRFRequest

[aaroneg]

Deployment Type

Self-hosted

NetBox Version

v4.0.6

Python Version

3.10

Steps to Reproduce

Review the "New VRF" screen in netbox, and compare to https://$hostname/api/schema/swagger-ui/#/ipam/ipam_vrfs_create .
Very few fields are listed in the schema for VRFRequest, and more fields are accepted by the API. The PatchedVRFRequest schema item looks more accurate.

Expected Behavior

The documentation lists all available fields for the type of object

Observed Behavior

The documentation is missing many fields.

[jeffgdotorg]

Thank you for reporting this problem in NetBox. I was able to reproduce it in a fresh installation of v4.0.6. I'm moving your issue along to needs owner status.

We're generally aware that there are gaps in our OpenAPI coverage, but currently lack the team capacity to prioritize an effort to address these kinds of problems. If you or another developer with the requisite skills and capacity would like to work it through to a PR, please say so and a maintainer will assign the issue to you.

(Apologies for the copypasta of my reply on #16765)

[aaroneg]

No need for apologies, opening the second issue it started to feel like i might be accidentally spamming.

[arthanson]

Closing this as duplicate of #16670