-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Wrong trace when multiple rear(multi position) cable. #16571
Comments
@joaolucasmacedo The repro is a bit hard to follow, so I'm not sure if doing exactly the same as you. If possible please make the repro steps as simple as possible, something like:
Below is what i think your repro is:
The following was tested: The trace looks good, I think so I'm not sure if you are doing something beyond that or special. Can you please double-check and if still encountering the issue try to post a simpler repro steps. |
@arthanson I tested many scenarios and now I found it looks like a bug. I did the steps as you said and everything looks fine, but then I tried using modules rather than direct rear ports. Below is what i think the repro is: If it is not clear, please let me know. |
Duplicate of #10602 |
Deployment Type
Self-hosted
NetBox Version
v4.0.5
Python Version
3.10
Steps to Reproduce
Expected Behavior
To trace the 2 interfaces properly.
Observed Behavior
It says "Asymmetric path!" showing a non related switch's interface.
See 2 fiber patch panels with 2 cassettes each, "DIO X1" and "DIO X2".
Each cassette gives a 12 position rear port and 12 LC front ports.
The patch panels are connected by 2 12 fiber cables on both cassettes.
Lets connect 2 switches, each on a different patch panel.
The image above shows a switch "SW X1A" interface connecting to 2 LC ports, and the switch on the other side is using the same ports on the other patch panel by the same interface "GigabitEthernet1/0/4".
The trace is not completed and the interfaces can't see each other.
Furthermore, if I use other single LC front port on each patch panel to connect interface "GigabitEthernet1/0/1" it show up on "Gi1/0/4" trace saying "Asymmetric Path!", and Gi1/0/1 is shown as Gi1/0/4 peer.
Is I delete the cables connecting both Gi1/0/1 interfaces and do the same with any other interfaces this last behavior does not show up.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: