Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Interface Speed: 400Gbps #13442

Closed
bitcollector1 opened this issue Aug 11, 2023 · 6 comments · Fixed by #13452
Closed

Interface Speed: 400Gbps #13442

bitcollector1 opened this issue Aug 11, 2023 · 6 comments · Fixed by #13452
Assignees
Labels
status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: feature Introduction of new functionality to the application

Comments

@bitcollector1
Copy link

NetBox version

v3.5.7

Feature type

Data model extension

Proposed functionality

Add 400G to the Speed

Screenshot 2023-08-10 at 17 24 19

Use case

We have 400G interfaces and would like to set the speed in NetBox.

Database changes

No response

External dependencies

No response

@bitcollector1 bitcollector1 added the type: feature Introduction of new functionality to the application label Aug 11, 2023
@jeremystretch jeremystretch added the status: needs owner This issue is tentatively accepted pending a volunteer committed to its implementation label Aug 11, 2023
@tagur87
Copy link

tagur87 commented Aug 11, 2023

Can I take a stab at this one?

@abhi1693 abhi1693 added status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation and removed status: needs owner This issue is tentatively accepted pending a volunteer committed to its implementation labels Aug 11, 2023
@jeremystretch
Copy link
Member

Assigned to you, @tagur87. I suggest adding an auto-complete option for 200 Gbps as well.

@sleepinggenius2
Copy link
Contributor

Based on the currently defined interface types, we are also missing 2.5 Gbps, 5 Gbps, 50 Gbps, and 800 Gbps. I think it would make sense to include those for completeness.

@jeremystretch
Copy link
Member

Let's not over-rotate on this. The dropdown is provided merely as a convenience; it is not intended to contain an exhaustive list of options.

@tagur87
Copy link

tagur87 commented Aug 14, 2023

Agreed @jeremystretch

I have a PR up for review. Let me know if there's anything missing.

@bitcollector1
Copy link
Author

I did not even know you could manually add the entries until after I created this request. Anyway, thanks for taking it up.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 14, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: feature Introduction of new functionality to the application
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants