Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Detailed view of Tenants show unrelated contacts #12763

Closed
jbakklund opened this issue May 31, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

Detailed view of Tenants show unrelated contacts #12763

jbakklund opened this issue May 31, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
status: duplicate This issue has already been raised

Comments

@jbakklund
Copy link

NetBox version

v3.5.2

Python version

3.9

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Create some sites, tenants, and contacts.
  2. Ensure that there are no contacts assigned to tenant number 1 at /tenancy/tenants/1/contacts/
  3. Add contacts to site number 1 at /dcim/sites/1/contacts/
  4. Navigate to /tenancy/tenants/1/contacts/

Expected Behavior

No contacts should be listed.

Observed Behavior

All contacts related to Site-ID 1 are listed under Tenant-ID 1.

@jbakklund jbakklund added the type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application label May 31, 2023
@jbakklund
Copy link
Author

jbakklund commented May 31, 2023

Looks like the same Contacts related to a specific Site-ID also will be misinterpreted as contacts for an eventual Circuit Provider with Provider-ID equal to the Site-ID.

@abhi1693
Copy link
Member

Duplicate of #12730

@abhi1693 abhi1693 added status: duplicate This issue has already been raised and removed type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application labels May 31, 2023
@abhi1693 abhi1693 closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale May 31, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 30, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
status: duplicate This issue has already been raised
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants