Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

It's now possible to create uneditable cables, that 1-side connected #12439

Closed
stavr666 opened this issue May 2, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed

It's now possible to create uneditable cables, that 1-side connected #12439

stavr666 opened this issue May 2, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels
severity: medium Results in substantial degraded or broken functionality for specfic workflows status: duplicate This issue has already been raised topic: cabling type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application

Comments

@stavr666
Copy link

stavr666 commented May 2, 2023

NetBox version

v3.5.0

Python version

3.10

Steps to Reproduce

Found it in today's Demo.

Cables with id 1-33, 87-92 have no A-side device or termination:

image

It causes server error with Edit attempt.

Expected Behavior

Pressing Edit must open Cable Edit form, validating connection on save.

Observed Behavior

Error "'str' object has no attribute 'label'":

image

@stavr666 stavr666 added the type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application label May 2, 2023
@jeremystretch
Copy link
Member

Thank you for opening a bug report. Unfortunately, the information you have provided is not sufficient for someone else to attempt to reproduce the reported behavior. Remember, each bug report must include detailed steps that someone else can follow on a clean, empty NetBox installation to reproduce the exact problem you're experiencing. These instructions should include the creation of any involved objects, any configuration changes, and complete accounting of the actions being taken. Also be sure that your report does not reference data on the public NetBox demo, as that is subject to change at any time by an outside party and cannot be relied upon for bug reports.

@jeremystretch jeremystretch added the status: revisions needed This issue requires additional information to be actionable label May 2, 2023
@stuntguy3000
Copy link
Contributor

stuntguy3000 commented May 3, 2023

I reckon it's a demo data problem - Null devices are specified for these cable terminations. Unable to find a way to make a cable w/out one end being terminated from the GUI.

Example of one:
image

@ThomasADavis
Copy link

Create the cable, then on one end disconnect it - this is not the same as editing or deleting the cable. Presto, one end connected, the other null. To get a null/null cable, you need to use the API.. and yes, it's possible to get some of those..

@arthanson arthanson self-assigned this May 4, 2023
@arthanson arthanson removed the status: revisions needed This issue requires additional information to be actionable label May 4, 2023
@jeremystretch jeremystretch added the status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation label May 5, 2023
@jeremystretch jeremystretch added the severity: medium Results in substantial degraded or broken functionality for specfic workflows label Jun 23, 2023
@DanSheps
Copy link
Member

Duplicate of #11460

@DanSheps DanSheps marked this as a duplicate of #11460 Jun 26, 2023
@DanSheps DanSheps closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jun 26, 2023
@DanSheps DanSheps added status: duplicate This issue has already been raised and removed status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation labels Jun 26, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 25, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
severity: medium Results in substantial degraded or broken functionality for specfic workflows status: duplicate This issue has already been raised topic: cabling type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants