You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
With #654, it uses LookupMap with () as the value type, which can lead to some unnecessary reads rather than just checking if a key exists. There also might be some unnecessary CPU cycles to use borsh to deserialize nothing (not sure if compiler would optimize away)
We want to make sure we do this before stabilizing, in case we need/want to change the storage format.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
With #654, it uses
LookupMap
with()
as the value type, which can lead to some unnecessary reads rather than just checking if a key exists. There also might be some unnecessary CPU cycles to use borsh to deserialize nothing (not sure if compiler would optimize away)We want to make sure we do this before stabilizing, in case we need/want to change the storage format.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: