Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LC Transitions Active Action Points to Passive When Application is in Passive Mode #4

Open
skliper opened this issue Apr 22, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels

Comments

@skliper
Copy link
Contributor

skliper commented Apr 22, 2022

During a stakeholder rehearsal there were several APs that were commanded "active" while the LC application state was in "passive" mode. Before operations could command the application state to "active" mode, some of the APs that were activated and had "tripped" causing the AP to transition back to passive mode. The purpose of changing a "tripped" APs state from active to passive is to prevent an RTS from getting initiated more than once. In "passive" mode, LC performs all limit tests as in "active" mode, but no stored command sequences are invoked as the result of AP failures. Having the AP's state transition while the application is in passive mode will make enabling APs with a low threshold while LC is in passive mode very difficult. The rational for this design feature needs to be clearly understood and documented. The LC user's guides (both doxygen and word/pdf) do not make this design feature clear. If no rational exists this design feature should be removed from LC.

Imported from GSFCCFS-744

@skliper skliper added the bug label Apr 22, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant