Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate alternative implementations for SUBSET_READS_PAIRED_TARGET #131

Open
willbradshaw opened this issue Dec 17, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
Labels
enhancement New feature or request priority_2 time&cost Changes to improve the pipeline's runtime and computational cost

Comments

@willbradshaw
Copy link
Contributor

SUBSET_READS_PAIRED_TARGET is currently a bit of a performance bottleneck. It's currently implemented with seqtk; since it's running on the entire dataset it's possible this is just irreducibly slow, but it's worth investigating whether alternative tools could do the same thing while lopping off some runtime.

However, this is lower priority than other performance enhancements included as issues here, e.g. #127, #128, #122, #74.

@willbradshaw willbradshaw added enhancement New feature or request priority_2 labels Dec 17, 2024
@willbradshaw willbradshaw added the time&cost Changes to improve the pipeline's runtime and computational cost label Dec 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request priority_2 time&cost Changes to improve the pipeline's runtime and computational cost
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant