You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
An issue that I have come across is that if we transform the phylogeny according to a multi-optimum OU model, will the unit tree still be ultrametric??
I am trying to figure this out b/c we look at the slope of the contrasts ~ branching.time, which might be messed up when using non-ultrametric trees as ape's branching.times() fxn returns negative values in this case. This statistic should still work but I may need to replace the branching.times fxn.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Issue by richfitz from Wednesday Sep 25, 2013 at 04:21 GMT
Originally opened as traitecoevo/modeladequacy#1
An issue that I have come across is that if we transform the phylogeny according to a multi-optimum OU model, will the unit tree still be ultrametric??
I am trying to figure this out b/c we look at the slope of the contrasts ~ branching.time, which might be messed up when using non-ultrametric trees as ape's branching.times() fxn returns negative values in this case. This statistic should still work but I may need to replace the branching.times fxn.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: