[SwipeableDrawer][Drawer] Include a simplified code-source version with only one Drawer, on the Drawer documentation.

[TommyJackson85]

• I have searched the issues of this repository and believe that this is not a duplicate.

Summary 💡

Just have second code source example (with sandbox) on the SwipeableDrawer section of the Drawer page.

The current one we have has 4 swipeable drawers from each side of the device. This is good to keep, but a lot of applications might only want it to be swiped from one direction for less complication.

We could keep the newer version as the prime example, and keep the 4 slides version as secondary.

Examples 🌈

This is the example I built:
https://codesandbox.io/s/material-demo-96r4c

Very simple set up.

Motivation 🔦

Just for developers who want to copy an easier version of it to work from. The current code source is just a little bit complicated in its set up. Took me around 10 + minutes bring it to just one drawer and cleaning up the code.

This could lead to including more complicated examples, like a mini variant drawer version (where it remains slightly closed), but it would also only have one drawer.

[mbrookes]

I wonder if we really need to show all the positions in a single demo?

[TommyJackson85]

The one we have on the site does anyway. I’m proposing just one side with this, so the code can be easier to implement for developers.

…

Sent from my iPhone

On 7 Mar 2020, at 17:10, Matt ***@***.***> wrote:  I wonder if we really need to show all the positions in a single demo? — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.

[mbrookes]

Yes, I'm just questioning whether it's necessary to have the "four side" version. @oliviertassinari ?

[TommyJackson85]

Personally, I think there is no harm keeping this as a second example to demonstrate it.

…

Sent from my iPhone

On 7 Mar 2020, at 19:40, Matt ***@***.***> wrote:  Yes, I'm just questioning whether it's necessary to have the "four side" version. @oliviertassinari ? — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.

[mbrookes]

In any case we can definitely add the simpler version. Would you like to submit a PR?

[TommyJackson85]

@mbrookes @oliviertassinari Created a PR on this! Here it is: #20040

…

Sent from my iPhone

On 7 Mar 2020, at 22:53, Matt ***@***.***> wrote:  In any case we can definitely add the simpler version. Would you like to submit a PR? — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.