You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, I am testing the validity of using smaller databases and then merging the results. However, when I am testing this, the results do not match those of querying one DB. For example, I have a DB with 40 species and created two DBs with 20 species each. When I use the MERGE function, the results of merging the two 20-species DB do not match the abundance results from the full 40-species DB. Here are the commands I am using:
Hi, I am testing the validity of using smaller databases and then merging the results. However, when I am testing this, the results do not match those of querying one DB. For example, I have a DB with 40 species and created two DBs with 20 species each. When I use the MERGE function, the results of merging the two 20-species DB do not match the abundance results from the full 40-species DB. Here are the commands I am using:
metacache build 20sp_DB1 /test_merge_DB/DB1 -taxonomy ncbi_taxonomy -remove-overpopulated-features
metacache build 20sp_DB2 /test_merge_DB/DB2 -taxonomy ncbi_taxonomy -remove-overpopulated-features
metacache query 20sp_DB1 MixA_1.fastq.gz MixA_2.fastq.gz -pairfiles -tophits -queryids -lowest species -out res1.txt
metacache query 20sp_DB2 MixA_1.fastq.gz MixA_2.fastq.gz -pairfiles -tophits -queryids -lowest species -out res2.txt
metacache merge res1.txt res2.txt -lowest species -taxonomy ncbi_taxonomy -max-cand 4 -hitmin 2 -hitdiff 2 -mapped-only -abundances test_abundance.txt -abundance-per species > out_metacache_merge.txt
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: