You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Commit 46945ff changed the package version from 5.0.1.6416.4ee6fd4-1 to 5.0.1-1. 5.0.1-1 is considered older than 5.0.1.6416.4ee6fd4-1, so pacman doesn't propose installing that version when performing a system upgrade. My local version is 5.0.1.6403.520736d-1, which exhibits the problem, though I believe 5.0.1.6416.4ee6fd4-1 would as well.
:: Starting core system upgrade...
warning: pacman: local (5.0.1.6403.520736d-1) is newer than msys (5.0.1-1)
warning: terminate other MSYS2 programs before proceeding
resolving dependencies...
looking for conflicting packages...
Packages (3) filesystem-2016.07-1 msys2-runtime-2.5.2-2 msys2-runtime-devel-2.5.2-2
Total Download Size: 5.80 MiB
Total Installed Size: 29.58 MiB
Net Upgrade Size: 0.00 MiB
:: Proceed with installation? [Y/n]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Did you find #566 when you were looking for reported issues? It mentions both the solution and reasons for this.
Generally speaking: Sometimes the package versions in the binary repositories are decremented. The recommended system update command for newer installations is pacman -Syuu, as per our updating instructions, which will also enable downgrades.
On Arch Linux, when a package is downgraded in one of the main repos (core, extra, community), or when the version changes in a way that would be considered older by pacman's version comparison rules, the epoch is also incremented so that users don't have to do pacman -Syuu. This happened, for instance, with wpa_supplicant, which was rolled back from 2.4 to 2.3.
Arch Linux recommends using pacman -Syu, not pacman -Syuu to perform a system upgrade. Shouldn't MSYS2 work the same way?
Commit 46945ff changed the package version from
5.0.1.6416.4ee6fd4-1
to5.0.1-1
.5.0.1-1
is considered older than5.0.1.6416.4ee6fd4-1
, so pacman doesn't propose installing that version when performing a system upgrade. My local version is5.0.1.6403.520736d-1
, which exhibits the problem, though I believe5.0.1.6416.4ee6fd4-1
would as well.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: