You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
On a scale from one to ten, how bad of an idea does this kind of syntax seem?
•10k3Ω±1% <=> #q(10.3 +/- 1 % kiloohm)
where bullet (•) would be an (arbitrarily chosen) reader macro dispatch character that parses an unparenthesized quantity.
This is probably a question of personal taste above all but I am curious what others would think. I have been having a bit of trouble cross-referencing constants in source code with values in datasheets and I think it's partly the different representations of the numbers, and particularly e.g. each one putting the order of magnitude (k/m) on a different side of the tolerance, making them "read aloud" in different ways.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
On a scale from one to ten, how bad of an idea does this kind of syntax seem?
where bullet (•) would be an (arbitrarily chosen) reader macro dispatch character that parses an unparenthesized quantity.
This is probably a question of personal taste above all but I am curious what others would think. I have been having a bit of trouble cross-referencing constants in source code with values in datasheets and I think it's partly the different representations of the numbers, and particularly e.g. each one putting the order of magnitude (k/m) on a different side of the tolerance, making them "read aloud" in different ways.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: