Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fails with node.js 9.6.0+ #48

Closed
papandreou opened this issue Feb 24, 2018 · 17 comments
Closed

Fails with node.js 9.6.0+ #48

papandreou opened this issue Feb 24, 2018 · 17 comments

Comments

@papandreou
Copy link
Contributor

Everything works fine with 9.5.0 and below, but on 9.6.0 a bunch of the tests fail with:

  1) Mitm via Http.request as request must emit request on Mitm:
     Uncaught TypeError: ParserIncomingMessage is not a constructor
      at HTTPParser.parserOnHeadersComplete (_http_common.js:81:21)
      at socketOnData (_http_server.js:472:20)
      at Socket.emit (events.js:125:13)
      at addChunk (_stream_readable.js:269:12)
      at readableAddChunk (_stream_readable.js:256:11)
      at Socket.Readable.push (_stream_readable.js:213:10)
      at InternalSocket.onread (net.js:590:20)
      at InternalSocket.readData (/home/andreas/work/node-mitm/lib/internal_socket.js:109:13)
      at InternalSocket.emit (events.js:125:13)
      at addChunk (_stream_readable.js:269:12)
      at readableAddChunk (_stream_readable.js:256:11)
      at InternalSocket.Readable.push (_stream_readable.js:213:10)
      at /home/andreas/work/node-mitm/lib/internal_socket.js:57:40
      at process._tickCallback (internal/process/next_tick.js:150:11)
@papandreou
Copy link
Contributor Author

Seems like this commit is the culprit: nodejs/node@c247cb02a1

@fyhao
Copy link

fyhao commented Mar 5, 2018

Yes, thanks, I encountered the same issue here. May I know when will this issue fixed and merged into master?

@papandreou
Copy link
Contributor Author

@fyhao, I've fixed it in #49 and published my mitm-papandreou fork. You can switch to that if you're in a hurry.

@dbellizzi
Copy link

This happens in node 8.12.0 as well, which was released yesterday.

@shudingbo
Copy link

This happens in node 8.12.0 as well, which was released yesterday.

me too,when upgrade 8.12.0

@papandreou
Copy link
Contributor Author

While you're waiting, you can switch to the mitm-papandreou package, which includes this fix.

@moll
Copy link
Owner

moll commented Sep 12, 2018

On it! Checking out @papandreou's work and ensuring it works on v10 as well. Hope to get a fix out tomorrow.

@moll moll closed this as completed in #49 Sep 13, 2018
@moll
Copy link
Owner

moll commented Sep 13, 2018

Thanks again, @papandreou, and others, for the Node v9.6+ debug help. While I was checking that out, I went ahead and fixed Node v10 and v8.12 as well as they seemed to introduce a few other incompatibilities.

I'll cut a release once I've heard some of you confirm that the master branch works on your machine with a real project. Doing the same myself.

@moll
Copy link
Owner

moll commented Sep 16, 2018

I'll publish the new version tomorrow. It seemed to continue to work fine on my own calendar app and presumably will on all of yours, too. :)

@papandreou
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've tested it a bit, and it does seem to fix the node.js 10 problems 🎉

I ran into some weirdness with node 8.12.0, though: https://travis-ci.org/assetgraph/assetgraph/jobs/428921736#L2808-L2821 -- but it seems to be due to a bad backport that has a fix on the way.

No matter what it's not a regression in node-mitm, so I say :shipit:

@moll
Copy link
Owner

moll commented Sep 16, 2018

That failing test seems to be using your fork which doesn't have the latest changes from here, right? I noticed the server issue and renamed that property to work-around that v8.12 prob.

@moll
Copy link
Owner

moll commented Sep 16, 2018

While it may not have been obvious, Mitm's server property on the client side socket was unrelated to how Node v8.12 started using it internally. ^_^

@papandreou
Copy link
Contributor Author

That failing test seems to be using your fork which doesn't have the latest changes from here, right? I noticed the server issue and renamed that property to work-around that v8.12 prob.

The failing test was running [email protected], which does include the latest changes here. I merged in master: papandreou@02f74f7

... But let's hope it sorts itself out when they fix node 8.12

@moll
Copy link
Owner

moll commented Sep 17, 2018

Gotcha. Do unexpected-mitm and httpception emit events again to trigger that bug on Node v8.12? Mitm.js's own triggering of connection does work now.

Anyways, I published v1.4 with the Node v8.12, v9 and v10 fixes so people who don't follow Mitm.js's master branch can continue using it. Thanks again everyone!

@moll moll closed this as completed Sep 17, 2018
@papandreou
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks a lot for sorting it all out!

Gotcha. Do unexpected-mitm and httpception emit events again to trigger that bug on Node v8.12?

No. There's a few places where the unexpected-mitm emits an error event on the client socket to simulate errors, but none of that code is in play for the test that failed.

I'll pick it up again and look for the root cause if the next node 8.x release still triggers it.

@moll
Copy link
Owner

moll commented Sep 17, 2018

Okei. Just FYI, my own app's tests that use Express.js with Mitm.js don't trigger errors under v8.12.

@papandreou
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yeah, there's a good chance that it's a bug in unexpected-mitm, or a weird edge case.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants